Will the real cycle life please stand up How can three well-respected codes, or design guides, not even be in the same ballpark when it comes to predicting bellows cycle life? On a recent bellows design the EJMA (Expansion Joint Manufacturers Association) curve gave a 7000 cycle rating; B31.3 gave 1150 cycles; and Section VIII/Appendix 26 for heat-exchangers gave 1100 cycles. For designs with higher EJMA cycles Appendix 26 results are even more anemic. That’s a big spread. As agent Mulder would say, the truth is out there somewhere. Freedom of information act: declassified data Psssst.all three curves are based on the same set of data points.
House mark for metal pipes, stripwound and corrugated hoses, flexible pipes, corrugated pipes, metal bellows, oval bellows, [ steering shaft bellows, ] thermal expansion bodies, thermal, vibration, volume and pressure compensators and expansion joints, seal and slip rings, tube and joint connections, hose and bellows decoupling elements. Hatena Bookmark - Ejma Bellows Software Samsung S4. An activation code, serial number, license code or registration number for a piece of software.
Yep, it’s true. Several years back, over a hundred bellows grouped from different manufacturers were fatigue tested.
The failure points were compared to pressure and deflection stresses and graphed. The raw data showed a tight grouping of points that was best defined by an averaging curve. EJMA used that curve to best predict bellows cycle life.
The B31.3 people dropped their curve below many of the scatter points. The rogue Appendix 26 group came up with a curve that dropped below all points.
Pipe loops are not held to this high of a standard. How did they get this dramatic of a change past the powerful expansion joint lobbyists in Washington? I need to tread lightly here. I will not go on record as saying that the secretive Appendix 26 committee has black helicopters, will come in the middle of the night, knock on your door, and you’ll never be seen again. No siree, you can’t quote me as saying that. You see, I fear them. Anybody that has that kind of control over something as innocuous as an established bellows fatigue curvewell, who knows what else they can control.
Designing for true longevity Isn’t an overly conservative design fatigue curve a good thing? Adding factors of safety onto factors of safety compromises other design considerations. A bellows design is always a balance between cycles and stability. A longer bellows has a lower instability or buckling pressure. It also increases the number of long-seam welds because the coil of material is no longer wide enough for a single seam.